<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>glx &#187; Camera Lucida</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glx.com/category/books/barthes-camera-lucida/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glx.com</link>
	<description>Books and Graphics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 06:55:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reading in a well lit room: Roland Barthes&#8217; Camera Lucida</title>
		<link>http://glx.com/books/reading-in-a-well-lit-room-roland-barthes-camera-lucida/</link>
		<comments>http://glx.com/books/reading-in-a-well-lit-room-roland-barthes-camera-lucida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 18:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Fromm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Lucida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(re)presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aesthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subject-object]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glx.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So . . . our first foray off of the Time Magazine list. And one which has some relevance to the book just finished: Atwood&#8217;s The Blind Assassin. But, to that in a bit . . . Barthes is attempting to get at the idea of Photography or the Photograph (capitalized whenever used in that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So . . . our first foray off of the Time Magazine list.  And one which has some relevance to the book just finished: Atwood&#8217;s <em>The Blind Assassin</em>.  But, to that in a bit . . . </p>
<p>Barthes is attempting to get at the idea of Photography or the Photograph (capitalized whenever used in that sense), the Heideggerian thing-in-itself (a variant of the Kantian Ding an Sich).  It is interesting that&#8212;at least in the first several sections of the text&#8212;there is dancing all around Heideggerian ideas, yet there is no mention of him.  But the same could be said for the work of the Marxist critic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin">Walter Benjamin</a>; his seminal piece &#8220;<a href="http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm">The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction</a>&#8221; is evoked (if not invoked) when Barthes notes:</p>
<blockquote><p>The first thing I found was this.  What the Photograph reproduces to infinity has occurred only once: the Photograph mechanically repeats what could never be repeated existentially. [4]</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-54"></span></p>
<p>A photograph is and is not what it (re)presents: it is an opportunity to mistake the finger pointing at the moon for the moon itself, while the pointing finger and the moon are also experienced as one &#8220;event,&#8221; an inseperable lamination.  One wonders if such difficulties arose in the use of other media to (re)produce images before the advent of photography; did such uncanny experiences&#8212;the disorder, dilemma, discomfort, dis-ease, defamiliarization&#8212;arise when viewing a painted portrait, for instance?</p>
<p>We are going to bring to our reading of Barthes the sensibilities and experiences of what he calls the <em>Operator</em>.  We have both taken images as well as both having been taken (surprised, as Barthes has it) by images and having both been image-ed.  How will this deeper perspective&#8212;Barthes is only approaching the Photograph from the aspects of <em>Spectator</em> and <em>Spectrum</em>&#8212;affect/effect our reading of his reading of the Photograph?</p>
<p>And speaking of reading photographs . . . let&#8217;s go back to the opening (and closing) of the embedded text of <em>The Blind Assassin</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>She retrieves the photograph when she&#8217;s alone, and lies it flat on the table and stares down into it.  She examines every detail: his smoky fingers, the bleached folds of their clothing, the unripe apples hanging in the tree, the dying grass in the foreground.  Her smiling face. [517]</p></blockquote>
<p>This is the sort of experience of a photograph that Barthes is getting at in terms of his project being a working out from personal experience of a few images to some sort of general sense of the Photograph (pp. 8 and 9).  I am sure that one of our topics of discussion will be whether he actually gets there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://glx.com/books/reading-in-a-well-lit-room-roland-barthes-camera-lucida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
